Cases 21 - 30 of 157
Torrey et al v. Infectious Diseases Society of America et al
as 5:2017cv00190
Plaintiff:
Kristine Woodard, Kathryn Kocurek, Lana Barnes and others
Defendant:
Dr. Leonard Sigal, United Healthcare Services, Inc., Infectious Diseases Society of America and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Caitlin McGrory, Amber Boyles and Steve Hepler
Not Classified By Court:
Hon. David Folsom (Ret.)
Guardian Ad Litem:
George Matteson
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
United Healthcare Services, Inc. v. United Therapeutics Corporation
as 8:2022cv02947
Plaintiff:
United Healthcare Services, Inc.
Defendant:
United Therapeutics Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
The Medical Society of the State of New York v. UnitedHealth Group Inc.
as 22-2702
Plaintiff:
Albert B. Knapp, M.D., P.C., on its own behalf and in the name of his business, which is identical, both directly and as the representative of PATIENT G; and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Dr. Darrick Antell, in the name of his business and on its own behalf, Podiatric OR of Midtown Manhattan, P.C., on its own behalf and on behalf of its patients, and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
The Medical Society of the State of New York, on behalf of its members, Society of New York Office Based Surgery Facilities, on behalf of its members and Columbia East Side Surgery, P.C., both directly and as the representative of PATIENTS C, D, E and F
Defendant / Appellee:
UnitedHealth Group Inc., United Healthcare Services, Inc., United HealthCare Insurance Company and others
UnitedHealthcare Insurance Company et al v. Envision Healthcare Corporation et al
as 3:2022cv00697
Defendant:
Envision Healthcare Corporation, Envision Healthcare Holdings, Inc. and Envision Physician Services, LLC
Plaintiff:
UnitedHealthcare Insurance Company, United HealthCare Services, Inc. and UMR, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Envision Healthcare Corporation v. United Healthcare Services Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00693
Plaintiff:
Envision Healthcare Corporation
Defendant:
United Healthcare Services Inc. and United Healthcare Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Jesse Polansky, et al v. Executive Health Resources Inc, et al
as 19-3810
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMUNITY HOSPITAL OF THE MONTEREY PENINSULA, UNITED HEALTHCARE SERVICES INC, EXECUTIVE HEALTH RESOURCES INC and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JESSE POLANSKY, M.D., M.P.H.
Appellant:
TAXPAYERS AGAINST FRAUD EDUCATION FUND, ERWIN CHEMERINSKY, NATIONAL WHISTLEBLOWERS CENTER and others
Amicus Curiae:
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Endometriosis Surgery Specialist PC v. Unitedhealth Group Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv10928
Plaintiff:
ENDOMETRIOSIS SURGERY SPECIALIST PC as authorized representative of E.H., and Endometriosis Surgery Specialist PC
Defendant:
Unitedhealth Group Inc., United Healthcare Services, Inc., UNITED HEALTHCARE INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
United HealthCare Services, Inc. v. Gilead Sciences, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv09202
Plaintiff:
United Healthcare Services Inc
Defendant:
Gilead Sciences Inc, Gilead Holdings, LLC, Gilead Sciences, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
UnitedHealthcare Insurance Company et al v. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
as 7:2020cv10664
Plaintiff:
UnitedHealthcare Insurance Company and United Healthcare Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
United HealthCare Services, Inc. v. Gilead Sciences, Inc. et al
as 0:2021cv02331
Plaintiff:
United HealthCare Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Gilead Sciences, Inc., Gilead Holdings, LLC, Gilead Sciences, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
