Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Ellis-Erkkila v. Manske et al
as 6:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
Priscilla A. Ellis-Erkkila
Defendant:
Magistrate Judge Jeffrey Manske, Magistrate Judge FNU Gilliland, Administrative Courts Counsel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Georgia State United States - FBI
as 1:2023cv04791
Plaintiff:
Lysandra Taylor
Defendant:
Georgia State and United States - FBI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PS) Johnson v. United States (FBI)
as 2:2022cv00727
Plaintiff:
Kevin B. Johnson
Defendant:
United States (FBI)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Hartjen v. United States FBI
as 2:2021cv00259
Plaintiff:
James M Hartjen
Defendant:
United States FBI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
(PS) Johnson v. United States (FBI)
as 2:2021cv00959
Plaintiff:
Kevin B. Johnson
Defendant:
United States (FBI)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HEMINGWAY v. UNITED STATES FBI et al
as 2:2020cv00638
Defendant:
BUCKS COUNTY PAROLE OFFICE, PECO ELECTRIC, LOWER MAKEFIELD POLICE and others
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN JAMES HEMINGWAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellis v. United States of America et al
as 4:2019cv00786
Defendant:
Patrick Scruggs, United States Director of FBI, United States FBI Sam and others
Petitioner:
Priscilla A. Ellis and Priscilla A Ellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv01262
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Gonzales v. United States (FBI) et al DO NOT DOCKET IN . CASE IS CONSOLIDATED UNDER 2:17cv27.
as 2:2017cv00037
Plaintiff:
Joe A Gonzales
Defendant:
United States (FBI) and United States Federal Marshal Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gonzales v. Mills et al
as 2:2017cv00027
Plaintiff:
Joe A Gonzales
Defendant:
Bill Mills, John Gutierrez, Roman Cortez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
