Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Mos-Bey v. Shroeder et al
as 5:2022ct03184
Plaintiff:
C. Joseph Mos-Bey and Christopher Mosby
Defendant:
Thomas D. Shroeder, John Brubaker, Joe L. Webster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
REID v. LAND et al
as 3:2022cv00053
Plaintiff:
RHONDA REID
Defendant:
JUDGE CLAY D LAND, GREENE COUNTY, STATE OF GEORGIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Austin v. United States Middle District of Florida
as 3:2020cv01163
Plaintiff:
Timothy Austin
Defendant:
United States Middle District of Florida
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THORNTON et al v. BENEFIELD et al
as 5:2019cv00306
Plaintiff:
GEORGETTE BENITA THORNTON and RASHEKA LASHON CHANDLER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, UNITED STATES, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EDWARDS v. UNITED STATES MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
as 1:2018cv00271
Plaintiff:
STEVEN EUGENE EDWARDS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
EDWARDS v. UNITED STATES MIDDLE DISTRICT COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA
as 1:2017cv01127
Plaintiff:
STEVEN EUGENE EDWARDS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES MIDDLE DISTRICT COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Fisher v. United States Middle District of TN
as 3:2014cv01814
Plaintiff:
John Fisher
Defendant:
United States Middle District of TN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fisher v. United States Middle District of TN
as 3:2014cv01799
Plaintiff:
John Fisher
Defendant:
United States Middle District of TN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Motley v. Mora et al
as 4:2014cv02420
Plaintiff:
Chequila Motley
Defendant:
Steve Mora and United States Middle District
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Motley v. Mora et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2014cv00617
Plaintiff:
Chequlia Motley
Defendant:
Steve Mora and United States Middle District
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
