Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 200
Lestage v. Coloplast, Corp. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-2037
Defendant: COLOPLAST A/S, CCS MEDICAL SUPPLIES, INC., BYRAM MEDICAL SUPPLIES and others
Plaintiff: KEVIN ROSEFF, KIMBERLY HERMAN, UNITED STATES, ex rel. and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: AMY LESTAGE
Interested Party: KENNY NACHWALTER, PA and PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND MANUFACTURERS OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: COLOPLAST, CORP.
Aarow Contracting, Inc. v. Fidelity Deposit Company of Maryland
as 8:2019cv00692
Plaintiff: United States ex rel Aarow Contracting, Inc. and Aarow Contracting, Inc.
Defendant: Fidelity Deposit Company of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States ex rel. et al v. National Labor Relations Board
as 1:2018cv05750
Plaintiff: Aretha Townsend and United States ex rel.
Defendant: National Labor Relations Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States, ex rel., Mechanical Systems of Dayton, Inc. et al v. Brigadier Construction Services, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv00408
Plaintiff: United States, ex rel., Mechanical Systems of Dayton, Inc. and Mechanical Systems of Dayton, Inc.
Defendant: Brigadier Construction Services, LLC and Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Type: Contract Miller Act
THE COHEN FAMILY 2007 TRUST BY TRUSTEES DAVID J. COHEN AND ABRAHAM J. COHEN v. THE UNITED STATES, EX REL. THE U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv12648
Plaintiff: THE COHEN FAMILY 2007 TRUST BY TRUSTEES DAVID J. COHEN AND ABRAHAM J. COHEN
Defendant: THE UNITED STATES, EX REL. THE U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
United States, ex rel. ESI, Inc. et al v. Brigadier Construction Services, LLC et al
as 3:2017cv00370
Plaintiff: United States, ex rel. ESI, Inc. and ESI, Inc.
Defendant: Brigadier Construction Services, LLC and Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Type: Contract Miller Act
U.S. ex rel. David Grant v. United Airlines, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-2151
Plaintiff - Appellant: UNITED STATES EX REL. DAVID GRANT
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED AIRLINES, INCORPORATED
:
United States of America v. Gosselin Worldwide Moving, N.V
as 17-2110
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES EX REL KURT BUNK, UNITED STATES EX REL. DANIEL HEUSER and UNITED STATES EX REL RAY AMMONS
Not Yet Classified: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: BIRKART GLOBISTICS GMBH & CO. LOGISTIK UND SERVICE KG, THE PASHA GROUP, ITO MOBEL TRANSPORT GMBH and others
Garnishee: GOVERNMENT LOGISTICS N.V., Belcrownlaan 23 Antwerp 2100 Belgium Government Logistics, N.V.
United States of America v. Gosselin Worldwide Moving, N.V
as 17-2110
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES EX REL KURT BUNK, UNITED STATES EX REL. DANIEL HEUSER and UNITED STATES EX REL RAY AMMONS
Intervenor/Plaintiff - Appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee: GOSSELIN WORLDWIDE MOVING, N.V., VIKTORIA INTERNATIONAL SPEDITION, GOSSELIN WORLD WIDE MOVING GMBH and others
Defendant: BIRKART GLOBISTICS GMBH & CO. LOGISTIK UND SERVICE KG, THE PASHA GROUP, ITO MOBEL TRANSPORT GMBH and others
Garnishee - Appellee: GOVERNMENT LOGISTICS N.V., Belcrownlaan 23 Antwerp 2100 Belgium Government Logistics, N.V.
United States ex rel Kurt Bunk v. Gosselin Worldwide Moving, N.V
as 17-2102
Plaintiff - Appellant: UNITED STATES EX REL KURT BUNK
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES EX REL DANIEL HEUSER and UNITED STATES EX REL RAY AMMONS
Intervenor/Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee: GOSSELIN WORLDWIDE MOVING, N.V., VIKTORIA INTERNATIONAL SPEDITION, GOSSELIN WORLD WIDE MOVING GMBH and others
Defendant: BIRKART GLOBISTICS GMBH & CO. LOGISTIK UND SERVICE KG, THE PASHA GROUP, ITO MOBEL TRANSPORT GMBH and others
Garnishee - Appellee: GOVERNMENT LOGISTICS N.V., Belcrownlaan 23 Antwerp 2100 Belgium Government Logistics, N.V.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?