Cases 1 - 10 of 36,106
Doe v. Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Incorporated
as 3:2024cv08100
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Embry Riddle Aeronautical University Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Allen v. Universal Protection Services, LLC
as 1:2024cv04175
Plaintiff:
Bianca Allen
Defendant:
Universal Protection Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04173
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
McKinney v. Combs et al
as 1:2024cv03931
Plaintiff:
Crystal McKinney
Defendant:
Sean Combs, Bad Boy Entertainment LLC, Sean John Clothing LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Morrison v. University of Texas et al
as 3:2024cv01222
Plaintiff:
Susan D Morrison
Defendant:
University of Texas, State of Texas, Thomas Spencer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01221
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00904
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01490
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Doe v. Northwestern University
as 1:2024cv04125
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Northwestern University
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985 Civil Rights
Gaines v. Grand Lodge of Maryland et al
as 1:2024cv01456
Plaintiff:
Stephen A. Gaines
Defendant:
Grand Lodge of Maryland, Regent University and Anthony Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
