Cases 71 - 80 of 64,975
Douglass v. HonorHealth et al
as 2:2024cv00928
Plaintiff:
Michael W Douglass
Defendant:
HonorHealth, HonorHealth named as: HonorHealth dba Deer Valley Medical Center doing business as Deer Valley Medical Center, Todd LaPorte and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00918
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Kamara #331657 v. Richardson et al
as 3:2024cv08074
Plaintiff:
Elijah Joseph Kamara
Defendant:
Unknown Richardson, Edward Jones, GEO Medical Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tate v. Unknown
as 3:2024cv00756
Petitioner:
Lionel Tate, Sr.
Respondent:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Dean v. Unknown
as 2:2024cv01173
Petitioner:
David Dean
Respondent:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03322
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00111
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 pr Complaint for mandamus relief (prisoner)
Harris v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv03215
Plaintiff:
Darien Harris
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Devinn Jones, Isaac Lambert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BOLIN v. TELL CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2024cv00148
Plaintiff:
DANNY R. BOLIN
Defendant:
TELL CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, JASON SHADWICK, BRYCE HAMMACK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith #443755 v. Hunt
as 2:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Fredricks Smith #443755
Defendant:
Unknown Hunt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
