Cases 1 - 10 of 17
SERRANO v. UPPERMAN et al
as 2:2023cv04482
Plaintiff:
NOEL SERRANO
Defendant:
NAYLAN UPPERMAN, RAISER-PA, LLC and UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
UPPERMAN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv16265
Plaintiff:
JUSTUS UPPERMAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
UPPERMAN v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023vv00512
Petitioner:
CHARLES UPPERMAN
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00006
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Upperman v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC et al
as 9:2021cv82450
Plaintiff:
Linda Upperman
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline LLC, GlaxoSmithKline (America) Inc., GlaxoSmithKline plc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Upperman v. Wright et al
as 4:2021cv00549
Defendant:
Winston, O'Neal, Howard and others
Plaintiff:
Aaron Upperman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
UPPERMAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv67074
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN UPPERMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Peppers v. Armel et al
as 5:2019cv00327
Defendant:
Davis, Sapp, Pollocl and others
Plaintiff:
Maurice Peppers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Peppers v. Myers et al
as 3:2019cv00189
Defendant:
DHO Officer D. Huff, Amy Armel, Officer Martin and others
Plaintiff:
Maurice Peppers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
101 Deep Eddy, LLC v. B&U KC Hardware, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv00817
Defendant:
Weston Bird, B&U KC Hardware, LLC f/k/a Industrial By Design, LLC and John Upperman
Plaintiff:
101 Deep Eddy, LLC
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
B&U KC Hardware, LLC and Industrial By Design
3Rd Party Defendant:
101 Commerce, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
