Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Thomas, Jr. v. The State of Georgia et al
as 1:2026cv04846
Defendant:
John Doe, The State of Georgia, Mitchell County, GA and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Thomas, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Vickers et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2026cv00659
Plaintiff:
Frederick Lamaze Smith
Defendant:
Trenton Vickers, Lt. Smute and Officer Mims
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv13713
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Vickers v. Moniz
as 1:2026cv13528
Petitioner:
Devon Vickers
Respondent:
Antone Moniz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Buerger v. City of Oak Creek Wisconsin et al
as 2:2026cv01310
Plaintiff:
Tyler Buerger
Defendant:
City of Oak Creek Wisconsin and Andrew Vickers
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family & Medical Leave Act 1993
Vickers v. Enterprise Leasing Company of Florida, LLC et al
as 8:2026cv02053
Plaintiff:
Sherman Vickers
Defendant:
Enterprise Leasing Company of Florida, LLC, Enterprise Holdings, Inc. and Does 1 through 20, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Washington v. McMaster et al
as 4:2026cv00733
Plaintiff:
Marcus L Washington
Defendant:
Andrew McMaster, Shell Gas Station, Circle K and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vickers v. Nulo Inc.
as 2:2026cv04105
Plaintiff:
Lachae Vickers
Defendant:
Nulo Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Sichanthavong v. Scholl
as 2:2026cv00125
Plaintiff:
Vicker Sichanthavong
Defendant:
Johnny Scholl
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv00041
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
