Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Luciano v. Federal Express Corporation
as 1:2026cv04449
Plaintiff:
Vince Luciano
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv02352
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
J.R. Automation Technologies, LLC v. Lowell
as 26-2548
Plaintiff:
J.R. AUTOMATION TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, a Michigan limited liability company
Defendant:
VINCE LOWELL and BEN GARVELINK
Rauf v. Vantell et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2026cv00705
Plaintiff:
Jihad Abdur Rauf
Defendant:
Vince Vantell and State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fedder v. Rovito et al
as 4:2026cv02560
Defendant:
Shannon Kantz, Vince Rovito, Zerbe Township Municipality and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Fedder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Veasley v. Stovall
as 3:2026cv50378
Plaintiff:
Vince A. Veasley
Defendant:
Steven Stovall
:
Service List
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01777
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Burgess v. Washtenaw County Trial Court et al
as 2:2026cv12887
Plaintiff:
Vince Burgess
Defendant:
Washtenaw County Trial Court, ADA Coordinator, Teresa Killeen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Donahue v. Scottsdale, City of et al
as 2:2026cv05504
Plaintiff:
Cochran F Donahue
Defendant:
Scottsdale, City of, Vince Johnson, Mark Ledo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mann v. Burciaga et al
as 2:2026cv12625
Plaintiff:
Vince Allen Mann
Defendant:
Burciaga, Lee, Taske and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
