Cases 1 - 10 of 97
Earle v. Frazier, et al.
as 26-3625
Plaintiff:
VIVIAN A. EARLE and Vivian A. Earl
Defendant:
UNKNOWN FRAZIER, UNKNOWN MCTIGHE, UNKNOWN KLINE and others
Mickell v. Buskirk et al
as 3:2026cv00340
Plaintiff:
Johnnie Mickell
Defendant:
Trooper Michael Van Buskirk, Pennsylvania State Police Administration, MDJ Edward Tarantelli and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Van Buskirk v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2026cv00042
Plaintiff:
Danny Van Buskirk, Jr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Unrue et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2025cv11787
Plaintiff:
Gary Unrue, Phil Upham, Carole Upton and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2025cv01911
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Ronald Van Buskirk v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2025cv04016
Defendant:
3M Company, Dupont De Nemours, Inc., UTC Fire & Security Americas Corp., Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Van Buskirk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Diggs v. Buskirk
as 3:2024cv00833
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lamont Diggs
Defendant:
Dr. Van Buskirk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Freeman, et al. v. 3Commas Technologies OU
as 24-6158
Plaintiff:
EDMUNDO PENA, LAWRENCE MANICKAM, MARC ASHBY and others
:
BRUCE JOHNSON, LORNE TRITT and FISHMAN JOSEPH
Defendant:
3COMMAS TECHNOLOGIES OU, an Estonian Private Limited Company
Boyd v. Harris et al
as 1:2024cv00249
Plaintiff:
Scott W. Boyd
Defendant:
Kristen Harris, Lyndsey Van Buskirk, Cheryl Mabray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anthony Diggs v. Dr. Van Buskirk
as 24-6154
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LAMONT DIGGS
Defendant:
DR. VAN BUSKIRK, E, BID
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
