Cases 21 - 30 of 158
Varnell v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company (JRG2)
as 1:2022cv00281
Plaintiff:
Brian R. Varnell
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Carter v. Varnell et al
as 4:2022cv00558
Plaintiff:
Debra Mae Carter
Defendant:
Lori Varnell, Elizabeth Beach, Tarrant County, Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harlan et al v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.
as 4:2022cv03156
Plaintiff:
Anthony Harlan, Aaron Sampson, Adam T. Bushman and others
Defendant:
Gilead Sciences Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Harlan et al v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.
as 6:2022cv00914
Plaintiff:
Anthony Harlan, Aaron Sampson, Adam T. Bushman and others
Petitioner:
Shaun Melling
Defendant:
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00172
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Hart v. Varnell et al
as 4:2021cv05150
Plaintiff:
Jason Mark Hart
Defendant:
Dr Daniel Varnell and DOC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VARNELL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv62608
Plaintiff:
ERIC VARNELL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv49257
Plaintiff:
VARNELL LLOYD JOHNSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Diggs v. United States of America
as 1:2021cv00687
Plaintiff:
Varnel L. Diggs
Defendant:
David A. Ezra and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Diggs v. United States of America
as 1:2021cv00474
Defendant:
Earl L. Yeakel and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
Varnel Diggs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
