Cases 21 - 30 of 50
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv11540
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 USC 2601: Family & Medical Leave Act of 1993
Garcia-Espinosa v. Verizon Wireless, LLC
as 1:2015at00529
Plaintiff:
Noe Garcia-Espinosa
Defendant:
Verizon Wireless, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Garcia-Espinosa v. Verizon Wireless, LLC
as 1:2015cv00978
Plaintiff:
Noe Garcia-Espinosa
Defendant:
Verizon Wireless, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Armstrong v. The Bartech Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv00592
Plaintiff:
D'Edra Armstrong
Defendant:
The Bartech Group, Inc. and Verizon Wireless, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Michael v. Verizon Communications, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00072
Plaintiff:
Emma G. Michael
Defendant:
Verizon Communications, Inc. , Cellco Partnership , Verizon Wireless, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv02313
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mable Steiner v. Verizon Wireless, et al
as 14-16157
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MABLE STEINER
Defendant - Appellee:
VERIZON WIRELESS, VERIZON WIRELESS, LLC and CELLCO PARTNERSHIP, DBA Verizon Wireless
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00663
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00059
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Debt Acquistion Company of Ame v. Warner Springs Ranchowners Ass, et al
as 14-55110
Debtor:
In the Matter of: WARNER SPRINGS RANCHOWNERS ASSOCIATION
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEBT ACQUISTION COMPANY OF AMERICA V, LLC
Defendant - Appellee:
WARNER SPRINGS RANCHOWNERS ASSOCIATION, PALA BAND OF MISSION INDIANS, RICHARD PACKARD and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
