Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Jerry Welty, Jr. v. Peter Meletis
as 19-7050
Defendant:
AMANDA LAMBERT, Director of Support Services, AUSTIN B. HAYNES, JR., Citizen at Large, PHILLIP CAMPBELL, Assistant fo the County Executive and others
Defendant / Appellee:
GEORGE HURLOCK, Director of Security, GLENDELL HILL, Chairman and PETER MELETIS, Superintendent
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JERRY WELTY, JR.
Back et al v. General Motors LLC et al
as 1:2019cv11372
Plaintiff:
Duane Roberts, James Flowers, Simon Semonin and others
Defendant:
General Motors LLC, Robert Bosch GmbH and Robert Bosch LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Welty v. Meletis et al
as 3:2016cv00659
Plaintiff:
Jerry Welty, Jr.
Defendant:
Pete Meletis, Amanda Lambert, Roderick Osborne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RILEY v. MEEKS
as 1:2013cv00003
Petitioner:
VICTOR RILEY
Respondent:
BOBBY L. MEEKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
New Orleans Saints, L.L.C., et al v. Cam Cleeland, et al
as 12-30839
Plaintiff - Appellee:
NEW ORLEANS SAINTS, L.L.C. and NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE MANAGEMENT COUNCIL
Defendant - Appellant:
CAM CLEELAND, RODERICK COLEMAN, DONTA JONES and others
New Orleans Saints, L.L.C. et al v. Cleeland et al
as 2:2011cv02093
Plaintiff:
New Orleans Saints, L.L.C. and National Football League Management Council
Defendant:
Cam Cleeland, Roderick Coleman, Donta Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Wagner v. The Prince William-Manassas Regional Adult Detention Center et al
as 1:2008cv00066
Plaintiff:
Kenneth L. Wagner, II
Defendant:
The Prince William-Manassas Regional Adult Detention Center, Creighton-Bey,, Smith, and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Riley v. United States Of America et al
as 1:2007cv02819
Petitioner:
Victor Riley
Respondent:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
