Cases 31 - 40 of 51
Robinson v. Giles Co. Jail et al
as 1:2013cv00037
Plaintiff:
Noah W. Robinson
Defendant:
Giles Co. Jail and Teresa Mattox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Warden, North Kern State Prison, et al.
as 1:2012cv01707
Plaintiff:
Brian Lamont Brown
Defendant:
Warden, North Kern State Prison, Warden, Centinela State Prison, S. Senner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pitts v. Cain et al
as 3:2012cv00373
Defendant:
K. Benjamin, N. Burl Cain, R. Childs and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lamar Pitts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hatzfeld v. Goord
as 12-356
Plaintiff - Appellant:
John Hatzfeld
Defendant:
John W. Burge, Superintendent, Auburn Correctional Facility
Defendant - Appellee:
Glenn S. Goord, Commissioner, Lester Wright, Chief Medical Officer, Frank R. Headly, Dep. Commissioner and others
Robinson v. Davis, et al
as 11-1525
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT W. ROBINSON
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHN DAVIS, Warden and JOHN W. SUTHERS, the Attorney General of the State of Colorado
Robinson v. Davis, et al
as 11-1302
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT W. ROBINSON
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHN DAVIS, Warden and JOHN W. SUTHERS, the Attorney General of the State of Colorado
Robinson v. Davis
as 8:2011cv00556
Plaintiff:
James W. Robinson
Defendant:
R.L. Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Myers v. Davis et al
as 3:2010cv00873
Plaintiff:
Deena Kaye Myers
Defendant:
Keith Davis, Clyde Alderman, Jerry Streat and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Warden
as 8:2010cv02152
Plaintiff:
James W. Robinson
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBINSON v. ATTY. GENERAL OF THE STATE OF N.C. et al
as 1:2010cv00136
Plaintiff:
ROBIN W. ROBINSON
Defendant:
ATTY. GENERAL OF THE STATE OF N.C. and SHERIFF'S DEPT.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
