Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 72
Hankins v. Boehns et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2011cv00127
Defendant: Mr. Ron Angelone, Mr. Lester Beard, Dr. Bedwell and others
Plaintiff: Ricky Lee Hankins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv00360
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Tucker v. Zigler et al
as 1:2011cv00047
Plaintiff: Jason W Tucker
Defendant: Joshua Zigler, Benjamin Williams, Justin Faw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tucker v. United States We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv00899
Plaintiff: Kenneth W. Tucker
Defendant: United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Tucker et al v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 0:2010cv04612
Plaintiff: Michelle Tucker and Junius W. Tucker
Defendant: Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic International Technology, Inc. and Medtronic Puerto Rico Operations Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tucker et al v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv02903
Plaintiff: Michelle Tucker and Junius W. Tucker
Defendant: Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic International Technology, Inc. and Medtronic Puerto Rico Operations Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tucker v. Sharp et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv00266
Plaintiff: Jason W Tucker, Sr
Defendant: Brian Sharp, David Bennet, Chet Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tucker v. Kay et al
as 1:2010cv00256
Plaintiff: Jason W Tucker, Sr
Defendant: Jay D Kay, Brian Sharp, Bill Starr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Darryl Tucker v. Warden, Chillicothe Correction
as 09-4269
Petitioner - Appellant: DARRYL W. TUCKER
Respondent - Appellee: WARDEN, CHILLICOTHE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Tucker v. Scott We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2009cv00905
Plaintiff: Donna W. Tucker
Defendant: Terry Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?