Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Wallace-Smith v. Wal Mart Stores, Inc
as 2:2010mc02686
Plaintiff:
Malisa Wallace-Smith
Defendant:
Wal Mart Stores, Inc
Davis v. Castelloe et al
as 5:2010ct03102
Plaintiff:
William Hencley Davis
Defendant:
Tommy Castelloe, Wallace W. Dixon, Sandra Wallace-Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Castelloe et al
as 5:2009ct03169
Plaintiff:
William Hencley Davis
Defendant:
Tommy Castelloe, Wallace W. Dixon, Sandra Wallace-Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
v. Smith et al
as 6:2009cv00053
Defendant:
William Wallace Smith, III, Virginia Military Institute and The Board of Visitors of the Virginia Military Institute
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jimmie Lawrence v. Roy Cooper
as 09-7
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JIMMIE WAYNE LAWRENCE
Defendant - Appellee:
ROY COOPER, Attorney General, North Carolina Department of Justice, GAIL EDWARDS DAWSON, Special Deputy Attorney General, North Carolina Department of Justice, SANDRA WALLACE SMITH, Assistant Deputy Attorney General, North Carolina Department of Justice and others
Defendant - None:
UNKNOWN ASSISTANT ATTORNEYS TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL and UNKNOWN JUDGE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv00066
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv04815
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv03170
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
SMITH v. TYCO INTERNATIONAL (U.S.) INC. et al
as 2:2008cv77878
Plaintiff:
WALLACE SMITH
Defendant:
TYCO INTERNATIONAL (U.S.) INC., TYCO INTERNATIONAL (U.S.) INC., TYCO INTERNATIONAL (U.S.) INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
