Cases 41 - 50 of 97,304
Gabler v. Fairbairn, et al
as 24-1199
Petitioner:
VICTOR GABLER
Respondent:
MARC FAIRBAIRN, Warden and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Martinez v. Healy
as 4:2024cv00833
Petitioner:
Henry Ermy Martinez
Respondent:
Warden Ian Healy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mauder v. Petri et al
as 1:2024cv00780
Plaintiff:
Andrew Mauder
Defendant:
CO Petri, Lt. Rosinski and Deputy Warden Ortiz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. Warden-FCI Beaumont
as 1:2024cv00161
Petitioner:
Danny Lee Banks
Respondent:
Warden-FCI Beaumont
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Miles v. Bowers
as 1:2024cv11243
Petitioner:
Arthur Miles
Respondent:
Warden Bowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bryan v. Cohen
as 5:2024cv02907
Petitioner:
T Terell Bryan
Respondent:
Warden Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Corderick v. Warden
as 1:2024cv00546
Petitioner:
Dewayne Gage Corderick
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moss v. McClain
as 5:2024cv00584
Petitioner:
Scotty Dale Moss
Respondent:
Warden Antonio McClain and Attorney General State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morrison v. Warden of SCI-Coal Township et al
as 2:2024cv01885
Petitioner:
Keith D. Morrison II
Respondent:
Warden of SCI-Coal Township, PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, MONTGOMERY COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hill v. State
as 4:2024cv02887
Petitioner:
Bruce A. Hill and Bruce Antwain Hill
Respondent:
State and Warden Broad River Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
