Cases 51 - 60 of 1,149
King v. Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv10327
Defendant:
Carrier Corporation, Fort Kent Holdings, Inc., IMO Industries, Inc. and others
Cross Defendant:
HBW Industries, Inc., Riley Power Inc., The Marley-Wylain Company, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
John S. King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl Petition for Removal - Product Liability
Parker et al v. Alfa Laval Incorporated et al
as 4:2020cv00172
Defendant:
Genuine Parts Company, BW/IP International Incorporated, Pfizer Incorporated and others
Plaintiff:
David Parker and Sharon Parker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
WHERRY v. HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv03376
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER LLC, KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER CO., AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS CORP. and others
Cross Defendant:
AMERICAN BILTRITE INC., SEARS, ROEBUCK AND COMPANY, PEP BOYS and others
Cross Claimant:
INGERSOLL-RAND COMPANY, 3M COMPANY, PEERLESS PUMP and others
Plaintiff:
GAIL ANN JAKUBAC-WHERRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Asbestos Litigation
WILLIAMS v. GASBARRE PRODUCTS INC. et al
as 2:2023cv00552
Plaintiff:
HAMISH WILLIAMS, EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF WILLIAM A. JONES and HAMISH WILLIAMS
Defendant:
GASBARRE PRODUCTS INC., INDUCTOTHERM CORPORATION, LINDBERG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Marcus et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 3:2022cv09058
Defendant:
CLEAVER BROOKS, INC., DOMCO PR.O.DUCTS TEXAS, INC., Honeywell International, Inc. FKA Allied Signal Inc, Individually and as Successor-in-Interest to the Bendix Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL R. MARCUS and VICTORIA L. MARCUS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Dennis Rockwell, et al v. ASCO, L.P., et al
as 22-56198
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DENNIS A. ROCKWELL and DAWN ROCKWELL
Defendant / Appellee:
ASCO, L.P., Successor-in-interest to Foster Engineering, FKA ASCO Valve, Inc., FKA ASCO Valve, LLC, FISHER CONTROLS INTERNATIONAL, LLC, FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION and others
Defendant:
AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, sued individually and as successor-in-interest to BUFFALO PUMPS, INC, CRANE CO., sued individually and as successor-in-interest to CHAPMAN VALVE CO, GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY and others
Cheek v. Lockheed Martin Corporation et al
as 3:2022cv06630
Plaintiff:
Sidney Cheek
Defendant:
Lockheed Martin Corporation, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Alfa Laval Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Gemaehlich et al v.Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 3:2022cv07518
Plaintiff:
Keith Gemaehlich and Betty Gemaehlich
Defendant:
AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, a subsidiary of AMPCO-PITTSBURGH CORPORATION, individually and as successor by merger to BUFFALO PUMPS, INC., individually and successor in interest to BUFFALO FORGE, Albay Construction Company, ALFA LAVAL, INC., individually and as successor in interest to THE DELAVAL SEPARATOR COMPANY and SHARPLES CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Michael Twombly v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv10236
Defendant:
Aurora Pump, Ford Motor Company, VAPOR POWER INTERNATIONAL and others
Cross Defendant:
Crosby Valve, LLC, Crane Co., York International Corporation and others
Cross Claimant:
General Electric Company, COPES VULCAN, INC., The Budd Company and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL TWOMBLY, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF WILBUR TWOMBLY and Michael Twombly
3Rd Party Defendant:
Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority
Not Classified By Court:
Robert B. Collings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Craig v. A.W. Chesterton Company et al
as 1:2022cv00462
Defendant:
Paramount Global, Chevron U.S.A. Inc., Redco Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Gloria Craig
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
