Cases 1 - 10 of 332
White v. Collier et al
as 4:2024cv00826
Plaintiff:
William Dexter White and George Edward Tustin, Jr
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, C.F. Hazelwood, Garthe Parker and others
Interested Party:
Joseph J Genovesi and Jason David Sheedy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Houchens Food Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00228
Plaintiff:
William E. White, Jr.
Defendant:
Houchens Food Group, Inc. and Food Giant Supermarkets, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
v. Houchens Food Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00118
Not Yet Classified:
Houchens Food Group, Inc., Food Giant Supermarkets, Inc. and william e white
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 in Personal Injury
White v. Lumpkin
as 24-40119
Petitioner:
William Dexter White
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
White v. Commissioner, Social Security
as 3:2024cv00467
Plaintiff:
William O. White
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of Commissioner's Final Decision
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03360
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
White v. Stenseth
as 0:2024cv00261
Petitioner:
William Demont White, Jr.
Respondent:
Lisa Stenseth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
William White v. Warden of Fed Correctional Ins - Cumberland
as 23-7116
Petitioner / Appellant:
WILLIAM A. WHITE
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN OF FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION - CUMBERLAND
Vaughn et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv04192
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
James Felton Vaughn, Fred Snetzer, Donal Snider and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
