Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv05320
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1138
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hill v. Danforth
as 2:2021at00884
Plaintiff:
William Clinton Hill
Defendant:
Paul Danforth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Moran et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2019cv00960
Defendant:
Charles Lenehen, Central Intelligence Agency, U.S. Senator Barack Obama and others
Plaintiff:
American Indian Tribes of the United States of America and Thomas J. Moran
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01851
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Campbell v. Clinton et al
as 1:2015cv05044
Plaintiff:
Patricia Campbell
Defendant:
William Clinton and Hillary Clinton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Quesada v. Clinton
as 4:2015cv00987
Plaintiff:
Marvelena Quesada
Defendant:
William Clinton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARMON et al v. MARYLAND DEPT. OF HEALTH AND MENTAL HYGIENE et al
as 1:2013cv00605
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM CLINTON HARMON
Defendant:
Maryland Dept of Health and Mental Hygiene and THE ORPHAN'S COURT FOR CECIL COUNTY MARYLAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HARMON et al v. MARYLAND DEPT. OF HEALTH AND MENTAL HYGIENE et al
as 2:2013cv00504
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM CLINTON HARMON
Defendant:
MARYLAND DEPT. OF HEALTH AND MENTAL HYGIENE and THE ORPHAN'S COURT FOR CECIL COUNTY MARYLAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Zemple v. United States Federal Government et al
as 0:2012cv02004
Plaintiff:
God Loren Lyle Zemple
Defendant:
United States Federal Government, William Clinton, George Bush, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
