Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Miller et al v Unknown Claimants
as 8:2021cv03348
Petitioner:
William H Miller and Nancy Miller
Claimant:
Unknown Claimants
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Miller v. State of GA et al
as 1:2021cv02487
Petitioner:
William H. Miller
Respondent:
Hart County and State of GA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MILLER v. THE COUNTY OF LAPORTE et al
as 3:2017cv00831
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM H. MILLER, JR.
Defendant:
THE COUNTY OF LAPORTE , THE CITY OF LAPORTE , HARLAN WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MILLER et al v. NATIONWIDE AFFINITY INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 5:2017cv03516
Plaintiff:
BETH ANN MILLER and WILLIAM H. MILLER
Defendant:
NATIONWIDE AFFINITY INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Richmond v. Miller et al
as 4:2015cv00093
Plaintiff:
John E. Richmond, Jr.
Defendant:
William H Miller , Jason S Dexter , Bryant Pearman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller et al v. Coloplast Corp.
as 2:2015cv04063
Plaintiff:
Wanda F. Miller and William H. Miller
Defendant:
Coloplast Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Miller et al v. Bayer Corporation et al
as 3:2011cv12425
Plaintiff:
Jean Miller and William H. Miller
Defendant:
Bayer Corporation, Bayer Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00364
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
MILLER v. AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv60177
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM H. MILLER and WILLIAM H. MILLER
Defendant:
AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS, INC., CERTAIN TEED CORPORATION, METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00460
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
