Cases 61 - 70 of 607
Nissen v. The William Thomas Group, Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv00395
Plaintiff:
Richard J. Nissen and Richard J. Nissen an individual doing business as Orthodontic Consultants of St. Louis
Defendant:
The William Thomas Group, Inc. and Enviromatic Corporation of America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Thomas v. Beadle et al
as 2:2022cv00146
Plaintiff:
William Thomas
Defendant:
F. Beadle, R. Pace, R. Houston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McPherson v. Progressive Direct Insurance Company
as 5:2022cv00603
Plaintiff:
William Thomas McPherson
Defendant:
Progressive Direct Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Thomas v Ysasi
as 2:2021cv00919
Plaintiff:
William Thomas
Defendant:
Y. Ysasi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMAS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2021cv01975
Plaintiff:
KRISTOPHER WILLIAM THOMAS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hoffman v. Montgomery County, Maryland et al
as 8:2021cv02727
Plaintiff:
Jamie Hoffman
Defendant:
Montgomery County, Maryland and Sgt. William Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Stone Works LLC v. Sims et al
as 4:2021cv00941
Plaintiff:
Stone Works LLC
Defendant:
Randy Sims, Megan Sims, William Thomas and others
WILLIAMS-THOMAS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv62391
Plaintiff:
CARLA WILLIAMS-THOMAS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BROWN v. ETHERIDGE et al
as 3:2021cv01482
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM THOMAS BROWN
Defendant:
CASEY J ETHERIDGE, ERIN MICHELLE AMBROSE and ERIN AMBROSE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Warden Martinez et al
as 1:2021cv05623
Petitioner:
William Thomas
Respondent:
Warden Martinez and US Attorney General Merrick Garland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
