Cases 1 - 10 of 312
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00182
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Withrow Networks, Inc. v. Google, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv03203
Plaintiff:
Withrow Networks, Inc.
Defendant:
Google, LLC and YouTube, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Watford et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 1:2024cv03085
Plaintiff:
Joseph Watford, Kenneth Vaughan, Greg Vanhooser and others
Defendant:
The 3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr Notice of Removal
United States v. Withrow
as 24-5040
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
BENNIE FRANK WITHROW, IV, AKA Lazy Wood
Brown v. Jividen et al
as 5:2024cv00152
Plaintiff:
Anthony Brown
Defendant:
Betsy Jividen, West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Michael Francis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00899
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Slaikeu v Withrow et al
as 3:2023cv00275
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Slaikeu
Defendant:
Withrow, Eisman, Underhill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Falk v. County of San Joaquin et al
as 2:2023cv02377
Plaintiff:
Brendon C. Falk
Defendant:
County of San Joaquin, Sheriff Patrick Withrow, Aaron Madrigal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Falk v. County of San Joaquin et al
as 2:2023at01052
Plaintiff:
Brendon C. Falk
Defendant:
County of San Joaquin, Sheriff Patrick Withrow, Correctional Officer Aaron Madrigal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
WITHROW v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv29029
Plaintiff:
SHANE WITHROW
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
