Cases 1 - 10 of 175
Williams v. City of Emeryville et al
as 3:2024cv02105
Plaintiff:
Taurice Williams
Defendant:
City of Emeryville, Dino Cristiani, Baylee Worthen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WORTHEN v. AHMAD et al
as 2:2024cv00680
Plaintiff:
DIVANTE WORTHEN
Defendant:
MOHAMMAD AHMAD, ASSAD MOHAMMAD, AMINU SULEMANA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01077
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Worthen et al v. Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company
as 5:2023cv01263
Plaintiff:
Joseph W Worthen and Kimberly J Worthen
Defendant:
Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
WORTHEN et al v. AUROBINDO PHARMA, LTD. et al
as 1:2023cv04163
Plaintiff:
GARY L. WORTHEN and LOLA E. WORTHEN
Defendant:
AUROBINDO PHARMA, LTD., AUROLIFE PHARMA, LLC, AUROBINDO PHARMA USA, INC. and others
In Re:
VALSARTAN LOSARTAN AND IRBESARTAN PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WORTHEN v. SHROPSHIRE
as 6:2023cv00043
Petitioner:
JACQUEZ WORTHEN
Respondent:
RALPH SHROPSHIRE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
WORTHEN v. SHROPSHIRE
as 7:2023cv00076
Petitioner:
JACQUEZ WORTHEN
Respondent:
RALPH SHROPSHIRE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
WORTHEN v. WEST CENTRAL GEORGIA REGIONAL HOSPITAL
as 4:2023cv00124
Plaintiff:
WALLACE ALLEN WORTHEN, JR
Defendant:
WEST CENTRAL GEORGIA REGIONAL HOSPITAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WORTHEN v. YORK et al
as 5:2023cv00047
Plaintiff:
JACQUEZ WORTHEN
Defendant:
Officer YORK, HOCOMB, TAREL TODDMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
