Cases 41 - 50 of 61
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00307
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY et al v. KINETIC CONCEPTS, INC. et al
as 1:2011cv00239
Plaintiff:
WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY and WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES
Defendant:
KINETIC CONCEPTS, INC. , KCI USA, INC. , KCI LICENSING, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kinetic Concepts, Inc. et al v. Wake Forest University Health Sciences
as 5:2011cv00163
Plaintiff:
KCI USA, Inc. and Kinetic Concepts, Inc.
Defendant:
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Kinetic Concepts, Incorporated, et al v. Bluesky Medical Corporation, et al
as 10-51102
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KINETIC CONCEPTS, INCORPORATED, KCI LICENSING, INCORPORATED, KCI USA, INCORPORATED and others
Defendant - Appellee:
BLUESKY MEDICAL CORPORATION and SMITH & NEPHEW INC
KINETIC CONCEPTS V SMITH & NEPHEW
as 11-1105
Plaintiff-Appellant:
KCI Licensing, Inc., KCI Manufacturing, KCI Medical Resources and others
Defendant-Appellee:
Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-2162
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Clark v. Washington University
as 4:2010cv01836
Plaintiff:
Tarren Clark
Defendant:
Washington University, UMSL, Wake Forest University and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-1842
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00151
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Clark v. Wake Forest University
as 4:2010cv00200
Plaintiff:
Tarren Clark
Defendant:
Wake Forest University, Forsyth County, Forsyth County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.