Cases 11 - 20 of 36
Robin Conyers v. Walgreen Company, et al.
as 5:2015cv02220
Plaintiff:
Robin Conyers
Defendant:
Does, Walgreen Company, Walgreen Pharmacy Services WHS, LLC and others
Hernandez v. Walgreen Company
as 5:2015cv00394
Plaintiff:
Christopher Hernandez
Defendant:
Walgreen Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Bennett et al v. Walgreen Arizona Drug Company et al
as 2:2014cv02169
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Bennett , John Herrera , Scott Kendall and others
Defendant:
Walgreen Arizona Drug Company and Walgreen Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Everett et al v. Walgreen Company
as 3:2014cv02151
Plaintiff:
Bryon Johnson, Martin Planey, Brian Coning and others
Defendant:
Walgreen Company doing business as Walgreens
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Alcazar et al v. Walgreen Company
as 2:2014cv13739
Plaintiff:
Sandra Alcazar , Evan Borin , Joshua Brink and others
Defendant:
Walgreen Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Dickey et al v. Walgreens Company Inc.
as 1:2014cv03048
Plaintiff:
Jamie Dickey, Regina Gray, Frank Maxwell and others
Defendant:
Walgreens Company Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Burdge et al v. Walgreen Company
as 4:2014cv00566
Plaintiff:
Andrew Burdge , Jessaca Hope (Hanson) , Darrell Jones and others
Defendant:
Walgreen Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Walker et al v. Walgreen Company
as 4:2014cv01649
Plaintiff:
Alphonso Walker , Renae Holzem , Thomas McLaughlin and others
Defendant:
Walgreen Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Backes et al v. Walgreen Company
as 2:2014cv04255
Plaintiff:
Danielle Backes , Robert Davis and Jacob Day
Defendant:
Walgreen Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Carla Theiss v. Walgreen Company
as 14-3933
Plaintiff - Appellant Cross-Appellee:
CARLA THEISS
Defendant - Appellee Cross-Appellant:
WALGREEN COMPANY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
