Cases 11 - 20 of 49,497
In re: Jonathan Walker
as 24-1423
Petitioner:
In re: JONATHAN E. WALKER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Larry Johnson, Sr. v. Lee Coffee, et al
as 24-5468
Plaintiff:
LARRY D. JOHNSON, SR.
Defendant:
LEE V. COFFEE, Assistant District Attorney (former). In individual and official capacity., ARTHUR THOMAS BENNETT, Judge Criminal Court. In individual and official capacity., GWENDOLYN ROOKS, General Sessions Court Judge. Individual capacity and others
South et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv00597
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Robert South, Edward W Allsman, David L Berry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Walker v. The City of New York
as 24-1273
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WALKER and Awol
Defendant:
THE CITY OF NEW YORK
Tyson v. Walker et al
as 5:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Lisa Tyson
Defendant:
Julian Walker and United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Walker v. Alan Ritchey, Inc.
as 4:2024cv00419
Plaintiff:
Andrea Walker
Defendant:
Alan Ritchey, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
LaKemper v. Huneycutt et al
as 5:2024cv00118
Plaintiff:
Cobey LaKemper
Defendant:
Ronnie Huneycutt, Amy L. Jenkins, Joseph A. Huffman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bunch v. Walker et al
as 4:2024cv02931
Plaintiff:
Philip Sean Bunch
Defendant:
Jamal Karim Walker, Sr and US Environmental Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03885
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
WALKER v. FARMERS CASUALTY INSURANCE CO.
as 2:2024cv05940
Plaintiff:
DENNIS WALKER
Defendant:
FARMERS CASUALTY INSURANCE CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
