Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Cary v. Ruddy et al
as 1:2026cv03268
Defendant:
Mario Orlando, Lackawanna Medical Armored, Tim Betti and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Tyler Cary
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walters v. Judy et al
as 1:2026cv03252
Defendant:
Francis Chardo, Katie Adam, P. Stevens and others
Plaintiff:
Preston W. Walters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Walter v. Safeco Insurance Company of America
as 2:2026cv00484
Defendant:
Safeco Insurance Company of America
Plaintiff:
Sean Walter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 bc Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Carbajal et al v. JB & SS Transports Corp et al
as 1:2026cv07076
Defendant:
JORGE BLANCO and JB&SS TRANSPORTS CORP
Plaintiff:
TERESA AMELIA PAJARES ZULOAGA and WALTER EDSON CARBAJAL CARBAJAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv14950
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv07035
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Dent (PS) v. USA et al
as 1:2026cv05842
Defendant:
Avery, Health Service Administrator, Vido and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Dent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Guille v. Walters
as 6:2026cv00072
Respondent:
Joseph Walters
Petitioner:
Adrian Guille
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Abdalkareem v. Walters et al
as 2:2026cv00267
Defendant:
Prosecutor, WCSO and Vince Walters
Plaintiff:
Salma Abdalkareem
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bracket Company Inc. et al v. Walters
as 3:2026cv12995
Defendant:
Shaw Walters
Plaintiff:
Baton Corporation Ltd. and Bracket Company Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836 (b) - Civil Action to Protect Trade Secrets
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
