Cases 1 - 10 of 80
Evans v. Sullivan et al
as 5:2024cv05051
Respondent:
Attorney General for the State of South Dakota and Warden Daniel Sullivan
Petitioner:
Harry David Evans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Putney v. Harford County Government et al
as 1:2024cv01459
Defendant:
Sheriff Jeffrey R. Gahler, Warden Daniel Galbraith and Harford County Government
Plaintiff:
Kory Putney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
McNeal v. Tucker et al
as 3:2024cv00619
Plaintiff:
Anthony McNeal
Defendant:
Nathan Tucker, Warden Daniel Monti and Daniel Monti
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vanwinkle v. Sgt Sizemore et al
as 5:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
Donald Vanwinkle
Defendant:
Sgt Sizemore, C.O. Roberts, R.N. Combs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Akers
as 1:2023cv00160
Plaintiff:
Anu White
Defendant:
Warden Daniel Akers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Balderas v. Valerius et al
as 2:2023cv01191
Plaintiff:
Eddie P Balderas
Defendant:
Denise H Valerius, Wendy W Delmer, Warden Daniel Cromwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Cueva
as 5:2023cv03833
Petitioner:
Donte Marquee Smith
Respondent:
Acting Warden Daniel Cueva
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ROACH v. MCKEAN COUNTY et al
as 1:2023cv00182
Plaintiff:
ANNA M. ROACH
Defendant:
MCKEAN COUNTY, WARDEN DANIEL J. WOOD, JOHN/JANE DOE(S) 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
James Nesby v. Daniel Cuevas
as 23-55505
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMES NESBY
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN DANIEL CUEVAS
Borrero v. Williams et al
as 5:2023cv01065
Plaintiff:
Jonathon Borrero
Defendant:
Warden Charles Williams, Deputy Warden Daniel Harouff, Nurse Practitioner Amy Enloe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
