Cases 21 - 30 of 45
Spence v. Faucher
as 19-1396
Petitioner / Appellant:
John Marshall Spence
Respondent / Appellee:
Warden Stephen Faucher
Goodman v. Lawrenceville Correctional Center et al
as 3:2019cv00010
Defendant:
Jeffery Molenhour, Jerry D. Tanner, Lawrenceville Correctional Center and others
Plaintiff:
Mack Goodman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Conley v. Jerome et al
as 5:2018cv05155
Defendant:
Warden Stephen Williams and Chief of Security Keith Day Jerome
Plaintiff:
David Lamont Conley, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roderick English v. Cpt. Livingstone
as 17-7142
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RODERICK JEROME ENGLISH
Defendant - Appellee:
CPT. LIVINGSTONE, SGT. WALKER, WARDEN LEWIS and others
Raul Rivera Chavez v. Santa Clara Superior Court et al
as 2:2016cv09613
Plaintiff:
Raul Rivera Chavez
Defendant:
Emergency Personal, Sgt. Kesloe, San Jose Police Department and others
English v. Livingstone et al
as 1:2016cv02985
Plaintiff:
Roderick Jerome English
Defendant:
Cpt. Livingstone, Sgt. Walker, Warden Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez v. Warden Mosby et al
as 7:2015cv00124
Defendant:
Assistant Warden Stephens, Medical Staff, Sgt Thompson and others
Plaintiff:
Julian Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gregory Baker v. US
as 15-7262
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGORY EARL BAKER
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
WARDEN STEPHENS, in her personal capacity, ANTHONY W. BATTS, in his personal capacity, A. W. CAMPOS, in his personal capacity and others
Jamison v. FCI Memphis et al
as 2:2015cv02395
Plaintiff:
Andrew Jamison
Defendant:
FCI Memphis, FCI Medical Department, Warden Stephens and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Alvin Corey v. P. Burt
as 11-6791
Petitioner - Appellant:
ALVIN SCOTT COREY
Respondent - Appellee:
P. A. BURT, JUDE O. ONUOHA, MR. KILLPATRICK and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
