Cases 31 - 40 of 21,800
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00414
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
George M. Churchill et al v. Warner Bros et al
as 2:2024cv02030
Plaintiff:
George M. Churchill and Katherine Kanter
Defendant:
Warner Bros, New Line Productions, Inc., Plan B Entertainment and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Warner v. Amgen Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv10632
Plaintiff:
Elissa M Warner
Defendant:
Amgen Inc., Amgen USA, Inc. and NOVARTIS INSTITUTES for BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Blake Warner v. Hillsborough County Clerk of Courts
as 24-10748
Plaintiff:
BLAKE WARNER
Defendant:
HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY CLERK OF COURTS
Broadcast Music, Inc. et al v. Full Throttle Roadhouse LLC et al
as 1:2024cv01050
Plaintiff:
Broadcast Music, Inc., Blackened Music, Dandelion Music Co. and others
Defendant:
Full Throttle Roadhouse LLC doing business as Full Throttle Roadhouse, Randy Snyder and Elizabeth Snyder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Peter Seamon v. Governor Joshua Shapiro, et al
as 24-1451
Plaintiff:
PETER R. SEAMON
Defendant:
GOVERNOR JOSHUA D. SHAPIRO, NANCY WALKER, Secretary of Labor & Industry, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY and others
Norris Pegues v. Karl Hoffman, et al
as 24-1366
Plaintiff:
NORRIS E. PEGUES
Defendant:
KARL HOFFMAN, Doctor, LYNN DOBBERT and CANDACE WARNER
BROADCAST MUSIC, INC. et al v. 569 FERNWOOD INC. et al
as 3:2024cv02042
Plaintiff:
BROADCAST MUSIC, INC., KIRSCHNER CBS MUSIC PUBLISHING, VELVET APPLE MUSIC and others
Defendant:
569 FERNWOOD INC. doing business as LIBRARY IV and BRIAN O'KEENEY
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Warner v. Desouza et al
as 3:2024cv00464
Plaintiff:
Michael Warner
Defendant:
Francis A. Desouza, Sam A. Samad, Frances Arnold and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
