Cases 31 - 40 of 1,741
Ardie Nolon, III v. Todd Ishee
as 23-7301
Plaintiff:
ARDIE D. NOLON, III, a/k/a Ardie Defronso Nolon
Defendant:
TODD E. ISHEE, RODERICK WATSON and TIMOTHY JONES
Watson v. Yes Care Corp. et al
as 1:2023cv03520
Plaintiff:
Thurman R. Watson
Defendant:
Yes Care Corp., Medical Director, Yes Care Corp, Corizon Health of Maryland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
US v. Ronald Watson
as 23-4756
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
RONALD EUGENE WATSON
Joshua Jordan v. SC Corrections Office of Investigations
as 23-7211
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOSHUA BRYAN JORDAN
Respondent / Appellee:
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS OFFICE OF INVESTIGATIONS AND INTELLIGENCE, MATTHEW B. WATSON and RICHARD M. DARLING
McDaniel v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2023cv00697
Plaintiff:
Tigress Sydney Acute McDaniel
Defendant:
State of North Carolina, North Carolina Department of Justice, North Carolina, North Carolina Administrative Office of the Courts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
HONEA v. WATSON et al
as 1:2023cv01041
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY A. HONEA
Defendant:
OFFICER WATSON, LIEUTENANT MCCORMICK, SERGEANT DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03214
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Smith v. Dotson et al
as 7:2023cv00743
Petitioner:
Dayomic J. Smith
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson and D. Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thompson v. Department of Social Services director Michael Leach et al
as 3:2023cv05696
Plaintiff:
Tori Keon Thompson
Defendant:
Department of Social Services director Michael Leach, Child Support Services director Tim Mose, Tony Cantone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
