Cases 1 - 10 of 21,329
Barnett v. Paxton et al
as 1:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
Caroline Sue Barnett
Defendant:
Ken Paxton, Kirk Watson, John Cowen and others
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
King v. Watson
as 2:2024cv02365
Petitioner:
Richard N. King
Respondent:
Tom Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Watson v. Smith
as 1:2024cv00567
Petitioner:
Dale William Watson
Respondent:
Stephen Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cobble et al v. Biden et al
as 1:2024cv02044
Plaintiff:
David Cobble and American Citizens
Defendant:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., Brad Raffensperger, Alexander Soros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. Williams (Bynum)
as 24-1253
Defendant:
WILLIAM BYNUM, ALAN ANDERSON, TERRENCE WILLIAMS and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Watson v. Doe et al
as 5:2024cv00244
Plaintiff:
Pierre Terron Watson
Defendant:
John Doe, S. Jones, A. Rich and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00646
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21785
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Watson v. State of Pennsylvania et al
as 1:2024cv00775
Petitioner:
James Watson
Respondent:
State of Pennsylvania, Warden of SCI-Coal Township and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21784
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
