Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Ranes v. Wattson
as 3:2023cv02112
Petitioner:
David Ranes
Respondent:
Warden Thomas Wattson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wexelman v. Wexelman et al
as 2:2023cv06765
Plaintiff:
harvey wexelman
Defendant:
PAMI WEXELMAN, lucia wattson and Lucia Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
Wattson v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co et al
as 6:2022cv03800
Plaintiff:
Yvonne Wattson
Defendant:
State Farm Fire & Casualty Co, State Farm General Insurance Co and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co
Special Master:
Patrick A Juneau, Jr and Cade Richard Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Ausby v. Rider et al
as 3:2022cv00715
Plaintiff:
Emerald M Ausby
Defendant:
Assistant Warden Rider, Major Rowland, Major Troyville and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wattson v. Town of Brookside, Alabama
as 2:2021cv00649
Plaintiff:
Sean Wattson
Defendant:
Town of Brookside, Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BAEZ v. FROELICH et al
as 1:2020cv00148
Defendant:
D. VARNER, LT. BEDNORO, MS. LUCAS and others
Plaintiff:
MANUEL BAEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00335
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Balderas v. Wattson et al
as 3:2018cv01368
Plaintiff:
Gilberto DeLeon Balderas
Defendant:
John Doe, Richard Wattson, Head Nurse Debra and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wroth et al v. City of Rohnert Park et al
as 3:2017cv05339
Plaintiff:
Christopher Wroth and Marni Wroth
Defendant:
City of Rohnert Park, David Sittig-Wattson and Sean Huot
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bryant v. Jacobs et al
as 6:2015cv01547
Plaintiff:
Patrick Lamar Bryant
Defendant:
Teresa Jacobs, C. Hodges, Sgt. Wattson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
