Cases 1 - 10 of 36,517
Ledkins v. Jackson et al
as 3:2024cv03027
Plaintiff:
Paul Eugene Ledkins
Defendant:
Mayor Jerry Jackson, Jeremy Ragland, Mitch Magness and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Abdullah v. Phillips et al
as 1:2024cv00603
Plaintiff:
Jalaal Abdullah
Defendant:
B. Phillips, C. Critchlow, E. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PHILLIPS v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00784
Petitioner:
ASHLEY PHILLIPS
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
John Marchisotto v. Juan Sanchez, et al
as 24-1922
Plaintiff:
JOHN F. MARCHISOTTO
Defendant:
JUDGE JUAN R. SANCHEZ, KENT A. JORDAN, MICHAEL A. CHAGARES and others
Robertson v. Hatfield et al
as 3:2024cv00621
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dewan Robertson
Defendant:
Gary Hatfield and Amber L. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Palmer
as 3:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Phillip Durelle Palmer individually and d/b/a Big Phil's Soul & Creole Cafe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Cortez et al v. Sterling Card Solutions Holdings, LLC
as 3:2024cv00338
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Cortez and Phillip Matoy
Defendant:
Sterling Card Solutions Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Phillips v. Sacramento Department of Child Support Services et al
as 1:2024cv00598
Plaintiff:
Michael St. Anthony Phillips
Defendant:
Sacramento Department of Child Support Services, Lisa Smith, Merced County Department of Child Support Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hearns et al v. MEJ Plumbing, LLC et al
as 0:2024cv60434
Plaintiff:
Patrick Hearns, Jr., Danel Phillips, Ernesto Dimitrie and others
Defendant:
MEJ Plumbing, LLC, Jason Cohen, Eric Lazar and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
