Cases 1 - 10 of 297
Rossi, et al. v. Becker, et al.
as 24-6600
Defendant:
JEFFREY N. MAGGIONCALDA, SCALE VENTURE PARTNERS, KPMG LLP and others
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN ROSSI, KIM STEVENSON and HOWARD TARLOW
Mitchell v. Casey
as 7:2024cv00686
Plaintiff:
Leon D. Mitchell, Jr.
Defendant:
Dustin Casey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sullivan v. Hartford Financial Services Group, et al
as 24-3114
Defendant:
TWIN CITIES FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, DR. EDWARD PROSTIC, DR. STEPHEN NOLKER and others
Plaintiff:
SCOTT B. SULLIVAN
ALEKSEENKO et al v. USA
as 1:2024cv01440
Plaintiff:
DIMITRY ALEKSEENKO, VASILYEV ALEKSEENKO, MARY M. BAKER and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Mitchell v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 2:2024cv01451
Plaintiff:
Paul D Mitchell, II
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice, Colette S Peters, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Barker v. Kelly et al
as 2:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
Mark Barker
Defendant:
Morieon Kelly, D Mitchell, Scott Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Buchanan v. Becker et al
as 3:2024cv02684
Plaintiff:
Steven J. Buchanan
Defendant:
Gregory W. Becker, Daniel J. Beck, Karen Hon and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Khademi v. Superior Court of Placer County, et al.
as 24-3447
Plaintiff:
DAVOOD KHADEMI
Defendant:
SUPERIOR COURT OF PLACER COUNTY, PAUL WAYNE COMISKEY, Criminal Defense Attorney, KEVIN DOHERTY, Criminal Defense Attorney and others
Mitchell v. Mayflower Transit, LLC
as 2:2024cv00308
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Mitchell
Defendant:
Mayflower Transit, LLC
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 11706 Carmack Amendent
Rossi, et al. v. Becker, et al.
as 24-2565
Petitioner:
STEPHEN ROSSI, KIM STEVENSON and HOWARD TARLOW
Respondent:
GREG W. BECKER, DANIEL J. BECK, KAREN HON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
