Cases 41 - 50 of 3,038
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00802
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
United States v. Thomas Pitts
as 24-1154
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Thomas W. Pitts
Turner v. State of North Carolina Pitt County et al
as 7:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
Bryan Anthony Turner
Defendant:
State of North Carolina Pitt County, Verna Donnelly, Sharon Rochelle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Pitts v. Dauzat
as 3:2024cv00107
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lamar Pitts
Defendant:
Michele Dauzat
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Welch v. Marquez et al
as 1:2024cv00629
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Darius Welch
Defendant:
J. Marquez, B. Pitts, S. Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKenzie v. Indiana State of et al
as 3:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
Leonard Antowyne McKenzie, III
Defendant:
Indiana State of, St Joseph County, Jenny Pitts Manier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LITITZ MUTUAL INSURANCE CO. v. PRIKIS et al
as 5:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
LITITZ MUTUAL INSURANCE CO.
Defendant:
NICHOLAS PRIKIS, SOPHIE PITTS AS MAXATAWNY TOWNSHIP, JOHN DEPLANQUE and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635 Breach of Insurance Contract
FORMAN v. MURPHY et al
as 1:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
JIMMIE HOWARD FORMAN
Defendant:
NURSE MURPHY, NURSE PITTS and DECATUR COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pitts v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Jacob P. Pitts and Jackie Pitts
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Anthony Wills, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Janava Group v. Physician Providers Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv01723
Plaintiff:
Janava Group
Defendant:
Physician Providers Inc. and Lisa B. Pitt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
