Cases 31 - 40 of 5,586
Chamberlin v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00424
Plaintiff:
William E. Chamberlin
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Boyd v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00445
Plaintiff:
William Boyd
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Ball v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00306
Plaintiff:
William Allen Ball
Defendant:
Social Security, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Williams v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00287
Plaintiff:
Zimmery Daron Williams
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Lombardi v. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
as 9:2024cv80311
Plaintiff:
David William Batchelder
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0205 Denial Social Security Benefits
White v. Commissioner, Social Security
as 3:2024cv00467
Plaintiff:
William O. White
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of Commissioner's Final Decision
Williams v. O'Malley
as 0:2024cv60400
Plaintiff:
Anna Maria Williams
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Williams v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
Stacey Williams
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Williams v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00111
Plaintiff:
Dee Dee Dallas Williams
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Netteland v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv05188
Plaintiff:
John William Netteland
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
