Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Cooper v. Dunn et al
as 3:2024cv00188
Plaintiff:
Erik Cooper
Defendant:
James Bruce Dunn, Ronald Crockett Newcomb, William Brownlow Marsh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WATERMAN v. EMCLAIRE FINANCIAL CORP et al
as 2:2022cv02230
Plaintiff:
MARC WATERMAN
Defendant:
EMCLAIRE FINANCIAL CORP, WILLIAM C MARSH, DAVID L. COX and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Hopkins v. Emclaire Financial Corp. et al
as 1:2022cv03147
Plaintiff:
Matthew Hopkins
Defendant:
Emclaire Financial Corp., William C. Marsh, David L. Cox and others
Stein v. Emclaire Financial Corp. et al
as 1:2022cv04109
Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein
Defendant:
Emclaire Financial Corp., William C. Marsh, Milissa S. Bauer and others
MARSH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv17087
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM DARDEN MARSH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MARSH v. OTTO et al
as 5:2020cv00637
Defendant:
C.O. KUTZMA, C.O. LEBANZE, C.O. OTTO and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM ROY MARSH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ABI-HANNA et al v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY
as 1:2019cv24241
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL TREZZA, ROSE M. CAMPANARO, HAROLD CAREY and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
ABI-HANNA et al v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY
as 2:2019cv17837
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL TREZZA, ROSE M. CAMPANARO, HAROLD CAREY and others
Defendant:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Gordon v. Mathieson et al
as 4:2018cv01111
Plaintiff:
Anton Gordon
Defendant:
Derek Mathieson , William D. Marsh , Alan R. Crain, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Perry v. Town of East Greenwich
as 1:2018cv00134
Plaintiff:
William Perry , Daniel Andrade , Seth Archambault and others
Defendant:
Town of East Greenwich
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
