Cases 1 - 10 of 19
John Doe v. Spring Hill College, et al
as 23-14031
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN DOE
Defendant / Appellee:
SPRING HILL COLLEGE, CRAIG MCVEY and WILLIAM ROBERT TATE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05269
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Doe v. Spring Hill College et al
as 1:2023cv00340
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Spring Hill College, Craig McVey, William Robert Tate and others
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX Educational Amendments 1992 - Sex Discrimination
Robinson v. Tate (INMATE 2)
as 2:2022cv00017
Plaintiff:
Neil Andrew Robinson
Defendant:
William A. Tate
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00658
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Matney-Tate v. Gardner Trucking, Inc., et al
as 4:2021cv07474
Plaintiff:
William Matney-Tate
Defendant:
GARDNER TRUCKING, INC.,, GARDNER TRUCKING CONVERSION, LLC,, CRST THE TRANSPORTATION SOLUTION, INC., and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00340
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McClendon v. Cash et al (INMATE 1) (LEAD)
as 2:2021cv00306
Plaintiff:
Willie Denoris McClendon
Defendant:
K. Cash
Consolidated Defendant:
Otis Smith, William A. Tate and M. Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McClendon v. Tate (INMATE 2) (MEMBER)
as 2:2021cv00311
Plaintiff:
Willie Denoris McClendon
Defendant:
William A. Tate
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tate v. Tennessee Department of Safety and Homeland Security et al
as 3:2020cv00161
Plaintiff:
William M Tate, Jr
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Safety and Homeland Security and Marcus Pyle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
