Cases 31 - 40 of 58
Franklin v. County of Placer et al
as 2:2017cv02277
Plaintiff:
Mike Franklin
Defendant:
County of Placer, Ronald Scott Owens, Maria Leftwich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wade v. Chao et al
as 3:2017mc80130
Plaintiff:
E. K. Wade
Defendant:
Elaine Chao, Woody Gilliland, Doug Betten and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Wade v. Chao et al
as 3:2017mc80085
Plaintiff:
E. K. Wade
Defendant:
Elaine Chao, Woody Gilliland, Doug Betten and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Winston v. Doyle et al
as 2:2017cv00316
Plaintiff:
LeAnthony Winston
Defendant:
William Doyle, Bob McCabe and Pete Beron
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doyle et al v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2017cv02662
Plaintiff:
William Doyle and Sonia Doyle
Defendant:
Janssen Ortho LLC, Johnson & Johnson Company, Bayer Pharma AG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wade v. Chao et al
as 2:2017cv00004
Plaintiff:
E. K. Wade
Defendant:
Elaine Chao, Woody Gilliland, Doug Betten and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Burnett et al v. The Islamic Republic of Iran et al
as 1:2015cv09903
Plaintiff:
Luis Merino, Kimberly Franco, Mary Kaye Crenshaw and others
Defendant:
The National Iranian Gas Company and Catherine Stefani
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Dana Asher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Antiterrorism & Effective Death Penalty Act 1996
Doyle v. Schmitt
as 4:2015cv00656
Petitioner:
William Doyle
Respondent:
David Schmitt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Curtis Smith v. McCarthy
as 14-6638
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CURTIS SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
MCCARTHY, Corporal or Sergeant or Lieutenant, DEPUTY TOLBERT and DEPUTY LAWSON
Defendant:
MAJOR BORUM and WILLIAM DOYLE, Grievance Coordinator
Dante Jones v. Kathleen Green
as 13-7749
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANTE A. JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN KATHLEEN GREEN, DARRYL WEBSTER, Facility Administrator, JON R. SCRAMLIN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
