Cases 11 - 20 of 30
CRENSHAW et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2017cv01820
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH CRENSHAW , OZZIE BROWN , LUCILLE BURKS and others
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES INC. , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CRENSHAW et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 1:2017cv00030
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH CRENSHAW , OZZIE BROWN , LUCILLE BURKS and others
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES INC, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Duke v. Colvin
as 3:2016cv02061
Plaintiff:
William Duke
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Bandara v. Mann et al
as 3:2016cv03212
Plaintiff:
DM Indika Bandara
Defendant:
Dan Mann, James A Compton, Carol Fowler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Progressive Preferred Insurance Company v. Douglas et al
as 1:2015cv02038
Plaintiff:
Progressive Preferred Insurance Company
Defendant:
Miriam Douglas, Regina Harvin , Williams Dukes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Dukes v. Colvin
as 3:2014cv00173
Plaintiff:
Charles Williams Dukes
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Dukes v. Godinez et al
as 1:2013cv01569
Plaintiff:
William Dukes
Defendant:
Salvadore Godinez, Randy Pfister, Melvin Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DUKE v. TRANS UNION, LLC et al
as 2:2012cv05179
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM DUKE
Defendant:
TRANS UNION, LLC and OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Ellis et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2012cv02360
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Plaintiff:
Sybil Ann Ellis and Donald William Duke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dukes v. Dart et al
as 1:2012cv02338
Plaintiff:
William Dukes
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, Toni Preckwinkle, Hickerson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
