Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Randall Otvos v. State of North Carolina
as 23-2225
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RANDALL OTVOS
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, WILKES COUNTY, DEPUTY LANDEN JAMES-DEAN BYRD, Wilkes County Office Employee and others
Otvos v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2023cv00158
Plaintiff:
Randall Otvos
Defendant:
State of North Carolina, County of Wilkes, Landen James-Dean Byrd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vazquez v. Brooks
as 4:2021cv00954
Plaintiff:
Jose Alfredo Olvera Vazquez
Defendant:
William F. Brooks doing business as New Beginnings Steel Erection
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Yankelov et al v. Peoples Bank and Trust Co.
as 1:2019cv02070
Plaintiff:
Richard L. Yankelov, Thomas Brumback, Matthew Trone and others
Defendant:
Peoples Bank and Trust Co.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Yankelov, et al. v. Peoples Bank and Trust Co.
as 1:2019cv02042
Plaintiff:
Richard L. Yankelov, Thomas Brumback, Matthew Trone and others
Defendant:
Peoples Bank and Trust Co.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Talia Johnson v. David Byrd
as 17-1305
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TALIA JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID V. BYRD, Chief District Court Judge, JEANIE R. HOUSTON, DISTRICT COURT JUDGE, WILLIAM F. BROOKS, DISTRICT COURT JUDGE and others
JOHNSON v. BYRD, ET AL.
as 1:2016cv01052
Plaintiff:
TALIA JOHNSON
Defendant:
DAVID V. BYRD, JEANIE R. HOUSTON, WILLIAM F. BROOKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curhan et al v. Brooks et al
as 1:2015cv11749
Plaintiff:
Linda Curhan and Jeffrey Curhan
Defendant:
William F. Brooks, III, Regina Brooks and Preferred Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brooks v. DePuy International Limited et al
as 3:2014cv04211
Plaintiff:
William F Brooks
Defendant:
DePuy International Limited , DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy Products Inc and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
