Cases 21 - 30 of 47
Howell v. Acting Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2018cv03813
Plaintiff:
William Howell
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Chow v. Baldwin et al
as 4:2017cv00865
Plaintiff:
Michelle Chow
Defendant:
Rick Baldwin , PEAG LLC , Eagle Private Capital LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452
Chow v. Baldwin et al
as 3:2017cv03056
Plaintiff:
Michelle Chow
Defendant:
Rick Baldwin , PEAG LLC , Eagle Private Capital LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-14014
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Walker v. Ford et al
as 1:2017cv01147
Plaintiff:
Derrick Walker
Defendant:
Tammie Ford, John Doe, William Howell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Ford et al
as 3:2017cv01076
Plaintiff:
Derrick Walker
Defendant:
Tammie Ford, John Doe, William Howell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howell v. Monroe County et al
as 6:2016cv06117
Plaintiff:
William Howell
Defendant:
Monroe County, Patrick O'Flynn, Ron Harling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Larry Southern v. Richard H. Bishoff, PC
as 15-2008
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY SOUTHERN, ROY SOUTHERN, YVONNE HARRIS and others
Plaintiff:
LUCILLE SOUTHERN, ODELL PARKER and RUTH PARKER
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD H. BISHOFF, PC, RICHARD H. BISHOFF, JOHN M. DEAKLE and others
Defendant:
ASBESTOS PROCESSING LLC, A. JOEL BENTLEY LAW OFFICE, CHARLES G. BLACKWELL, JR. and others
Intervenor:
WILLIAM HOWELL MORRISON
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00332
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howell v. Midland Funding, LLC et al (PLR2)
as 3:2015cv00072
Defendant:
Midland Funding, LLC and Midland Credit Management, Inc.
Plaintiff:
William Howell
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
