Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Bowman et al v Monteiro et al
as 1:2024cv10850
Plaintiff:
Leo Bowman and Zirahuen Bowman
Defendant:
Sgt Agnaldo P Monteiro, Officer William Hull, Officer Brenden Wheeler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Jeannite v. Flaherty et al
as 1:2024cv10364
Plaintiff:
Joel Jeannite
Defendant:
Maureen Flaherty, Charles Marshall, Judge Maura and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jeannite v. Hull
as 1:2023cv11316
Plaintiff:
Joel Jeannite
Defendant:
William Hull
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
William Hull v. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 5:2022cv00111
Plaintiff:
William Hull
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Hull v. WPX Energy, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv01517
Defendant:
Kimberly S. Lubel, Clay M. Gaspar, Richard E. Muncrief and others
Plaintiff:
William Hull
Thomas Robinson, et al v. PA Department of Corrections, et al
as 20-2698
Defendant / Appellee:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SECRETARY JOHN E. WETZEL and SMART COMMUNICATION, sued in their Private and Official Capacities
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS ROBINSON and WILLIAM HULL
Thomas Robinson, et al v. Pennsylvania Department of Cor, et al
as 19-2334
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SECRETARY JOHN E. WETZEL and SMART COMMUNICATION, Sued in their private & official capacities
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS ROBINSON and WILLIAM HULL
Daniels v. Hull et al
as 7:2018cv00148
Defendant:
William Hull, Jr and Dustin Nimz
Plaintiff:
Sherman Daniels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hull v. Henderson Specialties Inc
as 4:2017cv00383
Plaintiff:
William Hull
Defendant:
Henderson Specialties Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Roger Hull v. Kathryn Reynolds, et al
as 17-15055
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROGER WILLIAM HULL
Defendant - Appellee:
KATHRYN REYNOLDS, ISIDRO BACA, SHANNON MOYLE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
