Cases 41 - 50 of 128
Isbell v. Phoenix, City of et al
as 2:2018cv00290
Plaintiff:
William Mark Isbell
Defendant:
Phoenix, City of, Jody Bodway, Andrea Perez-Santillan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thibodeau v. Yazinski et al
as 1:2017cv00665
Defendant:
William Mark Pipkin and John J. Yazinski
Plaintiff:
Melissa Thibodeau
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
McGhee v. United States of America
as 1:2017cv00072
Petitioner:
William Mark McGhee
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Zoobuh v. JDI Dating et al
as 2:2017cv00163
Plaintiff:
Zoobuh
Defendant:
JDI Dating and William Mark Thomas
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 7701
England v. Collier-TDCJ Executive Director
as 3:2017cv00592
Petitioner:
William Mark England
Respondent:
Brian Collier-TDCJ Executive Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SCOTT v. J.P. MORGAN CHASE AND CO.
as 1:2017cv00249
Defendant:
J.P. MORGAN CHASE AND CO.
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM MARK SCOTT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Laucks v. McVay, et al
as 16-2420
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MELINDA LAUCKS
Defendant - Appellee:
MARK MCVAY, JOHN D. DEACON, JR., WILLIAM MARK RUSSO, as individual and in his official capacity as Court appointed "Special Master" and others
AdvancePierre Foods Inc Group Health Plan et al v. Jones et al
as 3:2016cv02364
Plaintiff:
AdvancePierre Foods Inc Group Health Plan and AdvancePierre Foods Inc
Defendant:
William Mark Jones, Stephen D Roberts, William Mark Jones Special Needs Trust and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Ashby v. Tollison et al
as 8:2016cv02581
Plaintiff:
William Mark Ashby
Defendant:
Officer Tollison, Officer Morgan and Joe Tyson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William Gibson v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 16-50827
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM MARK GIBSON
Respondent - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
