Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Maxwell v. Thomas
as 23-40699
Petitioner / Appellant:
William Maxwell
Respondent / Appellee:
Albert Thomas, III, Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
Maxwell v. Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
as 1:2022cv00040
Petitioner:
William Maxwell
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Maxwell v. Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
as 1:2022cv00038
Petitioner:
William Maxwell
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
JAMES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv26875
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM MAXWELL JAMES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Maxwell et al v. Outagamie County et al
as 2:2020cv00386
Plaintiff:
Estate of William Maxwell and Andrea Laakso Maxwell
Defendant:
Wisconsin Department of Corrections, Fay Geenan, Ann Gorski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv05609
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00281
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Craig Coley v. Ventura County, et al
as 2:2018cv10385
Plaintiff:
Coley Craig and Craig Coley
Defendant:
Deputy Taylor, County of Ventura, Norma Fort and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00095
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
United African-Asian Abilities Club et al v. Delta Nu Chapter of Kappa Sigma, Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv01623
Plaintiff:
011 UAAAC Member and United African-Asian Abilities Club
Defendant:
Bruna In Beverly Hills LLC, Delta Nu Chapter of Kappa Sigma, Incorporated, Does and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
