Cases
Davis v. Short et al (INMATE 2) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv00005
Defendant: Judge Short, Captain Huggins, Sherrif Turman and others
Plaintiff: William T. Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Taylor et al
as 8:2019cv02075
Defendant: Brian P Sterling, Phyllis Hopkins, Doctor T Burns and others
Plaintiff: William Tyrone Davis and William T Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2019cv02076
Defendant: South Carolina Department of Corrections, Warden Edsel T Taylor, Diane Hingle and others
Plaintiff: William Tyrone Davis and William T Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. VALDEZ CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv01504
Plaintiff: WILLIAM T. DAVIS
Defendant: VALDEZ CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT, LAURIE HULL-ENGLES, KATHERINE TODD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Type: Contract Plaintiff
Davis v. State of Mississippi We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2009cv00134
Plaintiff: William T. Davis
Defendant: State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
William Davis v. City of Murfreesboro We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-6495
Plaintiff - Appellant: WILLIAM T. DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee: CITY OF MURFREESBORO
Daniel v. Dept. of Veteran Affairs, et al
as 2:2007cv02554
Plaintiff: Lucretia Daniel
Defendant: Department of Veteran Affairs, Patricia Pittman, William T. Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. City of Murfreesboro et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2007cv00713
Plaintiff: William T. Davis
Defendant: City of Murfreesboro, City of Murfreesboro Building and Codes Department, Betts Barbier Nixon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?