Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02929
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
William Davis, Jr. v. Walmart Inc.
as 26-2177
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM DAVIS, JR.
Defendant:
WALMART INC., WALMART SUPER CENTER, CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH and others
Munn et al v. Bill Davis LLC et al
as 2:2026cv01438
Plaintiff:
Cierra Munn, Jessica Caperton, Macie Smith and others
Defendant:
Bill Davis LLC doing business as Gentlemen's Club, The and William Davis
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Realize Group, Inc. d/b/a Realize Therapeutics Corp. v. Davis
as 1:2026cv09213
Plaintiff:
Realize Group, Inc. d/b/a Realize Therapeutics Corp.
Defendant:
Dr. William Davis
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836 (b) Civil Action to Protect Trade Secrets
Davis v. Momah et al
as 1:2026cv04487
Plaintiff:
William Davis
Defendant:
Timothy O. Momah and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Davis v. Jones et al
as 1:2026cv02147
Plaintiff:
William Davis
Defendant:
Dijon Jones and Zane Garnsey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Davis v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 1:2026cv00160
Plaintiff:
William Davis
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Interested Party:
SSA Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv00202
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
ANDERSON v. PENNSYLVANIA KNIGHTS LLC et al
as 2:2026cv00539
Plaintiff:
GENESIS ANDERSON
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA KNIGHTS LLC, DAVITA, LLC doing business as PETLAND MONROEVILLE, WILLIAM DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
