Cases 1 - 10 of 15
HARRIS v. ARMEL et al
as 2:2022cv00635
Petitioner:
WILLIE HARRIS
Respondent:
ERIC T. ARMEL, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones et al v. Ivey et al (INMATE 1)
as 1:2020cv00587
Plaintiff:
Tavores Kasel Montgomery, Quincey Sanders, Paul Alvin Womack, Jr. and others
Petitioner:
Liston Maron Richardson, George Lee Thompson, III, Gregory L. Reaser and others
Defendant:
Jefferson S. Dunn, Steven T. Marshall, Louis V. Franklin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones et al v. Ivey et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00929
Plaintiff:
Tavores Kasel Montgomery, Treundous Qwavon Davis, Dameon Tunnell Stewart and others
Defendant:
Jennifer Anderson King, Sharon Folks, Jefferson S. Dunn and others
Petitioner:
Liston Maron Richardson, George Lee Thompson, III, Steven Christopher Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. USA
as 6:2018cv06653
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Willie Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Harris v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 6:2016cv00511
Plaintiff:
The Undersigned Prisoners and Willie Harris
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Texas Board of Pardons and Parole, Texas Correctional Industries and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Willie Harris v. Claire McCaskill
as 13-2220
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Willie Harris
Defendant - Appellee:
Claire McCaskill
Harris v. Stoddard et al
as 2:2013cv11698
Plaintiff:
Willie Harris
Defendant:
Cathy Stoddard, Erica Huss, Norwood and others
Harris v. McCaskill
as 4:2013cv00207
Plaintiff:
Willie Harris
Defendant:
Claire McCaskill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willie Harris v. Brown, et al
as 11-2605
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIE HARRIS
Defendant - Appellant:
ADERY, RN
Defendant:
BROWN and JOHN DOE, named as "Unknown Lab Technician"
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
